Ya wanna really cook the noodle ya use? What is the standard against which the sample is "amplified'. Read linked article with footnotes in its entirety, ok?
"Oregon is using the Thermo Fisher PCR test which lists a Ct of just under 40. According to University of Oxford scientists, any test with a Ct above 30 is completely unreliable. The higher the Ct value, the more times the sample had to be amplified to find any trace of the virus, and the less likely the person is infected. According to researchers who wrote the retraction request, when a Ct above 35 is used, “the probability that said person is actually infected is less than 3%, the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.”
"In the words of the late Dr. Kary Mullis, the PCR test’s designer, “Anyone can test positive for practically anything with a PCR test, if you run it long enough.” Dr. Mullis was a strong advocate against using the PCR test as a means of diagnostics because cycle thresholds above 30 are unreliable. Additionally, he warned that we should never use this technique for diagnosis due to the complexity of the process and due to a relatively high rate of false positive results when administered to asymptomatic individuals."
https://www.oregoniansformedicalfreedom.com/2020/12/pcr-tests-unraveled/
0 Comments